Update 2 the state of drm-next-4.6 and next steps

[Juan Ramón Molina Menor]

>   ---- On Tue, 24 May 2016 01:41:26 -0700 Alexander Mishurov <alexander.m.mishurov at gmail.com 
> <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>> wrote ----
>   > It's a SoC, actually. It doesn't even use a dedicated PCI address for
>   > "dev_priv->bridge_dev", I set the same address for bridge_dev as for
>   > video device itself in order to get some data from regs when I tried to
>   > rev my video.
>   >
>   > Also, I included device id, 0x0f31, to agp_i810.c which had a valleyvew
>   > driver in 3.8 update in order to load agp driver first. I don't know
>   > whether it is necessary in the newest versions, just in case.
>
> If it needs agp, that would explain it. I haven't reved agp support with
> the new drm. That's also why I don't support Arrandale yet.  I thought agp
> was dead. But maybe not for SoCs. Thanks.
>
> -M

Hi!

With a fresh DRM 4.6 kernel built this morning I can confirm the 
regression in AGP with a G41 Express chip which works very well with the 
3.9 version of DRM. I don’t know if a proper PR is necessary.

Best regards,
Juan