4.6 DM/i915 test report on Bay Trail (Celeron J1800)\

Natasha Kerensikova natbsd at instinctive.eu
Tue Jul 26 06:13:56 UTC 2016


Hello,

on Monday 25 July 2016 at 10:54, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> I've found on my Skylake machine that the modesetting driver is more 
> stable and produces fewer artifacts than SNA. I got to this driver by 
> deleting my /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/XX-intel-driver.conf 
> entirely: without a configuration directive to use the Intel X driver, 
> it just used the KMS stuff transparently.

Do you mean the "scfb" driver, instead of the intel one?

I haven't managed to make it work, but didn't try very hard. I read it
was unaccelerated, and I have already vesa that suits all my
non-accelerated needs, so I still wonder what would be the point of scfb
in my particular situation.

It doesn't seem to be present on the CFT image, because when I removed
all xorg conf, it showed exactly the same symptoms as my SNA testing, so
I guess (at least on the CFT image) X defaults to intel driver with SNA
acceleration.


Thanks for the help,
Natasha


More information about the freebsd-x11 mailing list