ports/181838: [patch] x11-servers/xorg-server: fix TLS variables with clang
Niclas Zeising
zeising at freebsd.org
Sat Sep 7 00:00:01 UTC 2013
The following reply was made to PR ports/181838; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Niclas Zeising <zeising at freebsd.org>
To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/181838: [patch] x11-servers/xorg-server: fix TLS variables
with clang
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 01:52:44 +0200
On 09/06/13 23:22, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 22:18:27 +0200 Niclas Zeising wrote:
>> Can you please elaborate a bit on this, exactly what happends when
>> setting that configure variable?
>
> The configure script tests how to declare a thread-local variable. For
> clang and gcc this is done using the __thread keyword like this:
>
> __thread int thread_specific_int_var;
>
> Other compilers use __declspec(thread) instead of __thread.
>
> The code in configure comes from the XORG_TLS call in configure.ac.
> XORG_TLS is defined in m4/xorg-tls.m4. Here are the relevant bits:
>
> AC_MSG_CHECKING(for thread local storage (TLS) support)
> AC_CACHE_VAL(ac_cv_tls, [
> ac_cv_tls=none
> keywords="__thread __declspec(thread)"
> for kw in $keywords ; do
> AC_TRY_COMPILE([int $kw test;], [], ac_cv_tls=$kw)
> done
> ])
> AC_MSG_RESULT($ac_cv_tls)
>
> The for-loop runs over the elements in $keywords and sets ac_cv_tls
> to the keyword if the compiler accepts it. The problem is that clang
> accepts __declspec(thread) but it doesn't actually work (there's a
> warning about this but no error) so when the for-loop ends ac_cv_tls
> is set to __declspec(thread). Because the test is inside AC_CACHE_VAL
> it can be skipped by defining ac_cv_tls which is what the patch does.
>
> I found a similar test in pixman but there the for-loop contains a
> break so it ends on the first successful keyword (i.e. __thread).
>
>> Have you tried and ensured that this doesn't break xserver built with
>> gcc?
>
> No, I currently don't have gcc installed, but the keyword for gcc is
> also __thread. You could search for __thread in a config.log generated
> with gcc to verify this.
>
Thank you for your very excellent description!
I'll look into this more during the weekend or beginning of next week.
Your patch looks fine, now that I understand it properly ;). I just want
to make sure that gcc still works, check the old xorg-server version,
and look through the rest of the xorg ports, in case this is needed
somewhere else as well.
Regards!
--
Niclas Zeising
More information about the freebsd-x11
mailing list