[ia64] graphics/dri breaks poudriere bulk

[Niclas Zeising]

On 12/14/13 12:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:11:45PM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>> On 12/14/13 07:14, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:09:52AM +0100, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>>>> On 12/13/13 23:59, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>>>>> On 12/13/13 23:52, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel at xcllnt.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll use pluto.freebsd.org so that you have access to the
>>>>>>> object trees if and when you'd like to peek at it...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Full logs are here:
>>>>>> 	pluto.freebsd.org:/usr/ports/graphics/dri/make.out
>>>>>
>>>>> Any chance you can make config.log (or the entire work directory) available?
>>>>> Regards!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, can you rebuild and reinstall graphics/libdrm as well, and provide
>>>> config.log from there?  It seems that for some reason something makes
>>>> the drm intel drivers not install, and that in turn makes dri break.
>>>> Regards!
>>>
>>> "Something" is the architecture being ia64.  Intel drivers and libdrm
>>> intel library only configure on x86.
>>>
>>
>> If that's the case, then dri is wrong to ask for them on ia64, and more
>> importantly, the makefile for libdrm is wrong, since it says that intel
>> dri drivers are built for i386, amd64, ia64 and pc98.  However, it would
>> be nice to get this tested.
> It makes absolutely no sense to build libdrm_intel.so or any intel mesa
> userspace driver on ia64, simply because there is no ia64 CPU which
> has any GPU, not specifically HD graphics.
> 
> I have no idea what you can test there.
> 

Except for the fact that it seems dri is looking for it, and this may be
a way to satisfy dri.
Regards!
-- 
Niclas Zeising