AMD E-350
Oliver Fromme
olli at lurza.secnetix.de
Mon Mar 14 20:30:24 UTC 2011
John Hein wrote:
> Some of this definitely pushing the envelope right now, so atom is
> likely more right for you. But using arm for this space (and low
> single digit W instead of 10-ish) seems not that far away.
Well, the Atom N330 has a TDP of only 8 W, which isn't
that bad for a 1.6 GHz 64bit 4-way processor (2 cores +
hyperthreading).
Of course, ARM processors may certainly have even better
performance/watt ratio. But I think I stay with i386-
compatible hardware for my particular case.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected
abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was the
last time you needed one?"
-- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal
More information about the freebsd-x11
mailing list