AMD E-350

Oliver Fromme olli at lurza.secnetix.de
Mon Mar 14 20:30:24 UTC 2011


John Hein wrote:
 > Some of this definitely pushing the envelope right now, so atom is
 > likely more right for you.  But using arm for this space (and low
 > single digit W instead of 10-ish) seems not that far away.

Well, the Atom N330 has a TDP of only 8 W, which isn't
that bad for a 1.6 GHz 64bit 4-way processor (2 cores +
hyperthreading).

Of course, ARM processors may certainly have even better
performance/watt ratio.  But I think I stay with i386-
compatible hardware for my particular case.

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

"If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected
abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was the
last time you needed one?"
        -- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal


More information about the freebsd-x11 mailing list