xf86-video-intel and UMS

[Martin Wilke]

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Robert Millan <rmh at debian.org> wrote:

> 2011/3/4 Lucius Windschuh <lwindschuh at googlemail.com>:
> > 2011/3/4 Robert Millan <rmh at debian.org>:
> >> Can someone explain why is xf86-video-intel 2.7.1 used in ports?  Unless
> >> I missed something, the GIT repository in FDO has more recent branches
> >> where UMS hasn't been removed yet:
> >>
> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/log/?h=2.8
> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/log/?h=2.9
> >>
> >> Is 2.7.1 really the latest portable version?
> >
> > It's at least the last version that works reliably and is compatible
> > to our libdrm, as I see it.
> > The xf86-video-intel v2.9 triggers assertions in our libdrm_intel.so.1
> > (just tested it) :-(
>
> Why not upgrade libdrm then?  Is there a problem with versions
> newer than 2.4.17?
>
>
FreeBSD doen't have GEM and KSM support yet..


> --
> Robert Millan
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-x11 at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>