[CFT] intel g33 & g45

Paul B. Mahol onemda at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 09:45:36 UTC 2008


On 9/30/08, Robert Noland <rnoland at freebsd.org> wrote:
> Attached is a patch to agp_i810 that should correctly handle that g33 /
> q33 intel chipsets.  It also should add support for the g45 series chips
> (x4500).  I don't have any of this hardware to test, so I need some
> feedback, either way.
>
> This also changes the 945 code slightly, so that is also worth testing.
> I am running on a 945gm now.
>
> This is against -CURRENT, but may apply to STABLE as well.

Patching doesnt work on CURRENT for me:

# cd /sys/dev/agp
# patch -C < /home/paul/src/freebsd/agp_i810-g33-g45.patch
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: agp_i810.c
|===================================================================
|--- agp_i810.c (revision 183193)
|+++ agp_i810.c (working copy)
--------------------------
Patching file agp_i810.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 70.
Hunk #2 failed at 134.
Hunk #3 failed at 155.
Hunk #4 failed at 485.
Hunk #5 failed at 501.
Hunk #6 failed at 512.
Hunk #7 failed at 530.
Hunk #8 failed at 567.
Hunk #9 failed at 657.
Hunk #10 failed at 674.
10 out of 10 hunks failed--saving rejects to agp_i810.c.rej
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|Index: agpreg.h
|===================================================================
|--- agpreg.h   (revision 183193)
|+++ agpreg.h   (working copy)
--------------------------
Patching file agpreg.h using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 215.
Hunk #2 failed at 259.
2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to agpreg.h.rej
done


More information about the freebsd-x11 mailing list