[IWN] Review

[Cedric GROSS]

Hello Adrian,

 

It’s up to you.

If you wish to continue commit  small part review split_6, split_7 and
split_8. Or directly test and commit split_8.

 

>From split_8, it’s remaining Sean’s work :

-          Led management

-          Power supply management

 

After that, freebsd repo will be at same level as my github repo. 

And may be will able to work on improving speed and add hostap mode.

 

Cedric

 

 

De : adrian.chadd at gmail.com [mailto:adrian.chadd at gmail.com] De la part de
Adrian Chadd
Envoyé : mercredi 16 octobre 2013 06:56
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : Sean Bruno; freebsd-wireless at freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [IWN] Review

 

Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge
in more stuff from you?

 

 

-adrian

 

 

On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS <cg at cgross.info> wrote:

> De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_bruno at yahoo.com]
> À : Cedric GROSS
> Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless at freebsd.org
> Objet : RE: [IWN] Review

>
> On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now.
> >
> > So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD.
> > Cedric
>
> Cedric:

Hi Sean,


>
> Which branch should we be testing?
>

As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an
split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC.

Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC series.
Could be a good idea to test this version with à lot of NIC.

> sean

Thanks
Cedric