Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090

PseudoCylon moonlightakkiy at yahoo.ca
Tue Mar 13 23:48:25 UTC 2012


On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko <ray at dlink.ua> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:55:06 -0600
> PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>>> > ------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > Message: 12
>>> > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:14:23 -0700
>>> > From: Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org>
>>> > Subject: Re: Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for
>>> > rt2860/rt3090 To: "Sevan / Venture37" <venture37 at gmail.com>
>>> > Cc: freebsd-wireless at freebsd.org
>>> > Message-ID:
>>> >        <CAJ-Vmo=jJmwY=bTVaKFYTd--1E9vzwgn54VMJyY82bc9pSWcBg at mail.gmail.com>
>>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>> >
>>> > On 11 March 2012 14:10, Sevan / Venture37 <venture37 at gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>> I'll post a new one in a bit. If you want to help, would you be
>>> >>> ok with git as opposed to hg?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> nope not at all but if its because of familiarity then in this
>>> >> scenario it doesn't make much difference which is used, same work
>>> >> flow, change, commit, push, pull, rinse, repeat. :)
>>> >
>>> > Hiya,
>>> >
>>> > Let's just strip the ^M's from the tree and as long as ray@ and
>>> > pseudocyclon are a-ok with the work thus far, I'll commit it to
>>> > -HEAD.
>>> >
>>> > We can then tidy things up from there.
>>> >
>>> > I just don't want to commit ^M's to the tree, or blatant style(9)
>>> > violations. But we can always tidy things up incrementally once
>>> > they're in the tree.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I've talked about ieee80211_send_bar() with matt, already.
>
> Can you please point me to that discussion?
>

rt2860_send_bar() is a workaround. Because we patched freebsd
ieee80211_send_bar(), we can simply call it instead of calling the
workaround function on r225013 and up.


AK


More information about the freebsd-wireless mailing list