update - new hal flag to force a full chip reset

Lev Serebryakov lev at FreeBSD.org
Sun Nov 6 19:19:02 UTC 2011


Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 6 ноября 2011 г., 22:15:19:

>>> Good luck, and thanks to everyone who has been testing my code out!
>>  Do you need any help? Maybe, running AP with additional debug output,
>> or something like this?
> Just dump the NF calibration results (sysctl dev.ath.X.hal.debug=0x8)
> and crank it up to say, 2 to 5 seconds (sysctl hw.ath.longcal=5).
> Let's see what the NF results are like.
   I've sent your these data, do you need more from exactly the same
 setup? :) I could make tests in the middle of working say, when
 environment isn't so noisy -- less APs are seen, and spee is better.

> I have a nasty feeling that the AR9280 series NICs report some rather
> high NF values. The values themselves aren't actually raw NF dBm,
> they're just a dB value - but the fact that it's so high is likely a
> symptom of the overall problem (which is likely that the signal levels
> are all configured wrong when faced with interference.)
  BTW, is here other ATH PCI chipsets with 802.11n? I've checked all
 Mirkotik Mini-PCI cards, for example, all of them are based on 9820,
 with different setups of RF part, some of them are single-band
 (2.4Ghz only), some of them are dual-band, some of them are dual-band
 and have amplifier, which adds some dBs of output, but chipset is the
 same. And the same with TP-Link cards, which could be purchased here
 (in Russia). It seems,

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev at FreeBSD.org>



More information about the freebsd-wireless mailing list