update - new hal flag to force a full chip reset
Lev Serebryakov
lev at FreeBSD.org
Sun Nov 6 19:19:02 UTC 2011
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 6 ноября 2011 г., 22:15:19:
>>> Good luck, and thanks to everyone who has been testing my code out!
>> Do you need any help? Maybe, running AP with additional debug output,
>> or something like this?
> Just dump the NF calibration results (sysctl dev.ath.X.hal.debug=0x8)
> and crank it up to say, 2 to 5 seconds (sysctl hw.ath.longcal=5).
> Let's see what the NF results are like.
I've sent your these data, do you need more from exactly the same
setup? :) I could make tests in the middle of working say, when
environment isn't so noisy -- less APs are seen, and spee is better.
> I have a nasty feeling that the AR9280 series NICs report some rather
> high NF values. The values themselves aren't actually raw NF dBm,
> they're just a dB value - but the fact that it's so high is likely a
> symptom of the overall problem (which is likely that the signal levels
> are all configured wrong when faced with interference.)
BTW, is here other ATH PCI chipsets with 802.11n? I've checked all
Mirkotik Mini-PCI cards, for example, all of them are based on 9820,
with different setups of RF part, some of them are single-band
(2.4Ghz only), some of them are dual-band, some of them are dual-band
and have amplifier, which adds some dBs of output, but chipset is the
same. And the same with TP-Link cards, which could be purchased here
(in Russia). It seems,
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev at FreeBSD.org>
More information about the freebsd-wireless
mailing list