vuxml corrections (was Re: FreshPorts :: VuXML -
6e740881-0cae-11d9-8a8a-000c41e2cdad)
Jacques A. Vidrine
nectar at FreeBSD.org
Sun Sep 26 11:05:04 PDT 2004
Thanks for catching and reporting these, Dan!
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 05:15:14PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm looking for additional pairs of eyes to verify that FreshPorts
> has marked the correct commits for:
>
> 6e740881-0cae-11d9-8a8a-000c41e2cdad
>
> The FreshPorts pages to view are:
>
> <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla/>
>
> Nothing affect by this vuln. It seems the affecte versions where
> never put into our tree. Ranges are:
>
> <range><ge>1.7.a,2</ge><lt>1.7</lt></range>
> <range><ge>1.8.a,2</ge><lt>1.8.a2,2</lt></range>
>
> Should that top one be 1.7,2 not 1.7?
Yep! Corrected.
> There are two packages with the name mozilla. In addition to the URL
> listed above, see also:
>
> <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla-devel/>
>
> Nothing affecte there. We have only 1.4b-1.6a in the tree. Looks
> good.
I think I misunderstood something. We certainly have later versions,
and the referenced page lists them, e.g. mozilla-1.8.a3,2.
> <http://beta.freshports.org/www/mozilla-gtk1/>
>
> The ranges are: <range><ge>1.7.a</ge><lt>1.7</lt></range>
>
> Nothing marked at that URL either.
>
> Is this looking good or bad?
Yep, that looks good!
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:13:18PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Just looking at "ca6c8f35-0a5f-11d9-ad6f-00061bc2ad93" which contains
> this:
>
> <name>apache13</name>
>
> But, from what FreshPorts knows, there is no such package. These are the
> packages it knows:
>
> www/apache13-ssl | apache+ssl
> www/apache13-modssl+ipv6 | apache+mod_ssl+ipv6
> www/apache13-modssl | apache+mod_ssl
> www/apache13-modperl | apache+mod_perl
> www/apache13+ipv6 | apache+ipv6
> www/apache13 | apache
> www/apache-jserv | apache-jserv
> www/apache2 | apache
> www/apache-forrest | apache-forrest
> www/apache-contrib | apache-contrib
> net/apache-soap | apache-soap
> devel/apache-ant | apache-ant
> sysutils/apachetop | apachetop
>
> Should the vuln be changed? Is FreshPorts wrong?
You are correct, the element <name> is wrong. Corrected.
Cheers,
--
Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio
nectar at celabo.org / jvidrine at verio.net / nectar at FreeBSD.org
More information about the freebsd-vuxml
mailing list