bhyve win-guest benchmark comparing

[Felix Palmen]

* Andrea Venturoli <ml at netfence.it> [20200420 10:53]:
> First: this patch seems to apply cleanly to 12.1. Is it safe? At least worth
> testing?

I applied it to my 12.1-RELEASE before it was even committed to head --
the result is awesome.

> Xeon are not affected, since they have vAPIC, so they should be already
> running as fast as possible. Correct?

I don't know the details, but on my Xeon E3-1240L v5, it did have a huge
effect.

-- 
 Dipl.-Inform. Felix Palmen  <felix at palmen-it.de>   ,.//..........
 {web}  http://palmen-it.de  {jabber} [see email]   ,//palmen-it.de
 {pgp public key}     http://palmen-it.de/pub.txt   //   """""""""""
 {pgp fingerprint} A891 3D55 5F2E 3A74 3965 B997 3EF2 8B0A BC02 DA2A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-virtualization/attachments/20200420/2ec2f4ab/attachment.sig>