turn off 220V on UPS device =} file system got corrupted Re: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues?

[Victor Miasnikov]

Hi!

K.P.> - Pulling the power on the active node hosting both VM's (i.e. Windows
K.P.> guest, and FreeBSD guest) - this showed the remaining node trying to bring
K.P.> up the VM's (of which Windows came up OK, and FreeBSD [file system]  got corrupted).


A.G.> Yes, it should work.
A.G.>My understanding is that the failover should be agnostic to the guest OS but there could be some integration 
component that we might have missed.


 What _exactly_ "should work" ?


1)  This issue not related Hyper-V cluster itself
!)  When "Pulling the power" i.e. turn off 220V in Europa ( or 110V in USA ) on UPS device _both_  FAT on Windows and 
FreeBSD [file system]  got corrupted

(  "Windows came up OK"  look like because on this VM file system is NTFS )


K.P.> Hyper-V correctly see's the node fail, and restarts both VM's on the
K.P.> remaining node. Windows 7 boots fine (says it wasn't shut down correctly -
K.P.> which is correct) - but FreeBSD doesn't survive.
K.P.>
K.P.> At boot time we get a blank screen with "-" on it (i.e. the first part of
K.P.> the boot 'spinner') - and nothing else.
K.P.>
K.P.> Booting to a network copy of FreeBSD and looking at the underlying virtual
K.P.> disk - it appears to be trashed. You can mount it (but it understandably
K.P.> warns it's not clean) - however, any access leads to an instant panic ('bad
K.P.> dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry').
K.P.>
K.P.> Trying to run fsck against the file system throws up an impressive amounts
K.P.> of 'bad magic' errors and 'rebuild cylinder group?' prompts.

 To Karl: I ask You about some details . . .
Are You see related e-mail?


Best regards, Victor Miasnikov
Blog:  http://vvm.blog.tut.by/




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)"
To: "Karl Pielorz"
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:50 PM
Subject: RE: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues?


> Thanks again Karl! Yes, it should work.
>My understanding is that the failover should be agnostic to the guest OS but there could be some integration component 
>that we might have missed.
>So it would be good to get to the bottom of this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Abhishek

 ________________________________________
> From: Karl Pielorz
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:45 AM
> To: Abhishek Gupta (LIS);
> Subject: RE: Hyper-V 2012 Cluster / Failover - supported? - Any known issues?
>
> --On 18 September 2013 14:23 +0000 "Abhishek Gupta (LIS)"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Karl,
>>
>> Thanks for reporting the issue. Please give us some time to investigate
>> and get back to you on this. In the meantime I wanted to ask if setting
>> up a Hyper-V replica for the FreeBSD VM and then a manual failover
>> reproduces the same symptoms? Please let me know.
>
> Hi,
>
> Manual fail-over appears to work OK - in order, I tested:
>
> - Live migration from one node to the other, and back again (worked)
>
> - Stopping the cluster service on one of the nodes (i.e. from Failover
> Cluster Manager) - this showed the VM moving from the node that was
> stopped, over to the other node (again worked).
>
> - Pulling the power on the active node hosting both VM's (i.e. Windows
> guest, and FreeBSD guest) - this showed the remaining node trying to bring
> up the VM's (of which Windows came up OK, and FreeBSD got corrupted).
>
>
> I've had to stop now as the guy here looking after the Synology kit on the
> test network is applying a firmware update (this is apparently for some
> appletalk issue or something).
>
> I'll re-run the test after this has been done - if it still fails, I'll
> come back with a 'how to reproduce' type report (and I'll obviously let you
> know if we can't reproduce it again!).
>
> At least I know it 'should' work now :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Karl