VIMAGE + PF crash in mbuf destructor
adrian at freebsd.org
Mon Jul 22 19:01:34 UTC 2013
Well I'm worried about _other_ stuff causing issues here.
So - what's the "right" behaviour? Does vnet/vimage make the
assumption that for all the mbuf processing/free operations, the vnet
tag/state is set?
On 22 July 2013 11:59, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> I don't think the default vnet context is the correct behaviour there.
>> We'd need to figure out what the vnet context of the mbuf is and set
> What do you think about Marko's suggestion to de-virtualize
> V_pf_mtag_z? What would be the down side of that?
> I don't understand enough of the PF code to understand which variables need
> be virtual and which don't.
More information about the freebsd-virtualization