SANE vs USB scanner on 8.0

[Daniel O'Connor]

On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 29 October 2009 04:55:53 Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > > -       if (sscanf(dev, "libusb:%d:%d", &busnum, &devnum) != 2)
> > > > +       if ((sscanf(dev, "libusb:%d:%d", &busnum, &devnum) !=
> > > > 2) && +           (sscanf(dev, "libusb:/dev/usb:ugen%d.%d",
> > > > &busnum, &devnum) != 2)) {
> > > >             DBG (DL_MAJOR_ERROR, "%s: could not parse device
> > > > string: %s\n", me, strerror(errno));
> > > >             return 0;
> > > >
> > > > If it works, get the patch sent to the sane developers.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately no (I reworked it to match the path it uses) and
> > > now it segfaults. I rebuilt sane with debugging (is there some
> > > way to make libtool not strip on install? It's so tedious
> > > manually editing makefiles to remove -s..) as well as libusb.
> >
> > Have you had a chance to look at this? :)
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > PS I'm not subscribed to usb@ so perhaps I missed a reply.
>
> No. Please file a bug-report on the sane mailing list.

Hmm, but isn't the crash in libusb?

(I understand that it may be possible that sane is using libusb badly 
however!)

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/attachments/20091029/f93303dd/attachment.pgp