virtualizing keepalive parameters

[Bjoern A. Zeeb]

On 25 Nov 2016, at 20:36, Mike Karels wrote:

> I just "virtualized" the TCP keepalive parameters for a project at 
> work,
> although it isn't actually VIMAGE.  I could easily do the same for 
> VIMAGE.
> It seems like the right thing to do, but I don't know if there have 
> been
> previous discussions on this.  Are there any reasons not to do this?

There is a possibility that “less trusted” parties inside a jail 
could keep lots of sockets open for long, but that risk is there anyway.

So no, I don’t see a reason not to do it.   Feel free to add me to the 
Review once you upload it.

/bz