virtualizing keepalive parameters
Bjoern A. Zeeb
bzeeb-lists at lists.zabbadoz.net
Fri Nov 25 21:46:01 UTC 2016
On 25 Nov 2016, at 20:36, Mike Karels wrote:
> I just "virtualized" the TCP keepalive parameters for a project at
> although it isn't actually VIMAGE. I could easily do the same for
> It seems like the right thing to do, but I don't know if there have
> previous discussions on this. Are there any reasons not to do this?
There is a possibility that “less trusted” parties inside a jail
could keep lots of sockets open for long, but that risk is there anyway.
So no, I don’t see a reason not to do it. Feel free to add me to the
Review once you upload it.
More information about the freebsd-transport