[Bug 237068] /usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.30 assertion fail elflink.c:2824

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237068

--- Comment #9 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd at yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #8)

Notes for the 2nd message and what follows. What follows
after the messaging appears interesting, noting the
comment's content.

(gdb) bt    
#0  error_handler_internal (fmt=0x101dbc48 "BFD %s assertion fail %s:%d",
ap=0x3fffffffffffcdf8 "") at bfd.c:1093
#1  0x00000000100204e8 in ld_bfd_error_handler (fmt=<optimized out>,
ap=<optimized out>) at ./ldmain.c:187
#2  0x0000000010049b7c in _bfd_error_handler (fmt=<optimized out>) at
bfd.c:1178
#3  0x000000001002047c in ld_bfd_assert_handler (fmt=<optimized out>,
bfdver=<optimized out>, file=<optimized out>, line=<optimized out>) at
./ldmain.c:177
#4  0x0000000010049de4 in bfd_assert (file=<optimized out>, line=<optimized
out>) at bfd.c:1429
#5  0x00000000100a520c in _bfd_elf_fix_symbol_flags (h=h at entry=0x811e77b70,
eif=eif at entry=0x3fffffffffffd0e0) at elflink.c:2935
#6  0x00000000100a5800 in _bfd_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol (h=0x811e77b70,
data=0x3fffffffffffd0e0) at elflink.c:2962
#7  0x0000000010053d28 in bfd_link_hash_traverse (htab=0x810e50000,
func=@0x10223738: 0x100a57b0 <_bfd_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol>, info=<optimized
out>) at linker.c:669
#8  0x00000000100ac588 in bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections
(output_bfd=0x810e4b000, soname=<optimized out>, rpath=0x8105fee80
"$ORIGIN/../lib:/usr/local/lib", filter_shlib=0x0, audit=0x0, depaudit=0x0, 
    auxiliary_filters=<optimized out>, info=0x102324d8 <link_info>,
sinterpptr=<optimized out>) at elflink.c:6847
#9  0x0000000010032b34 in gldelf64ppc_fbsd_before_allocation () at
eelf64ppc_fbsd.c:2107
#10 ppc_before_allocation () at eelf64ppc_fbsd.c:404
#11 0x00000000100264e0 in ldemul_before_allocation () at ldemul.c:82
#12 0x000000001001d644 in lang_process () at ldlang.c:7593
#13 0x00000000100047b8 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at
./ldmain.c:440

At #5 *h shows:

_ZZN4llvm7hashing6detail18get_execution_seedEvE4seed@@LLVM_6.0
root.type = bfd_link_hash_defweak
is_weakalias = 1

*h->u.alias shows:

__bss_start@@LLVM_6.0
root.type = bfd_link_hash_indirect
is_weakalias = 0

So again: def->root.type== bfd_link_hash_indirect


The code continues after the two BFD_ASSERT messages.

If eventually reaches the xexit in main's :

477       /* Even if we're producing relocatable output, some non-fatal errors
should
478          be reported in the exit status.  (What non-fatal errors, if any,
do we
479          want to ignore for relocatable output?)  */
480       if (!config.make_executable && !force_make_executable)
481         {
482           if (verbose)
483             einfo (_("%P: link errors found, deleting executable `%s'\n"),
484                    output_filename);
485     
486           /* The file will be removed by ld_cleanup.  */
487           xexit (1);
488         }

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.