powerpc64 example, base/binutils presence vs. devel/powerpc64-gcc build failure: "phase: build-depends" confused then gcc config aborts build

[John Baldwin]

On 10/12/18 6:51 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> The following is from attempting to build devel/powerpc-gcc
> via poudriere-devel on the powerpc64 system after having
> bootstrapped via (in part) base/binutils and the .txz
> produced on the host (amd64).
> 
> Looks like having both:
> 
> /usr/bin/powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-*
> and:
> /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-*
> 
> in a powerpc64 environment confuses "phase: build-depends"
> in poudriere for the devel/powerpc64-gcc build:

Ah, I could see that.  I had kept the longer binary names with the full tuple
since the original base/binutils had them, but I've considered stripping them
as we only really need /usr/bin/as, etc. for the base system.  I hadn't gotten
to the point of trying to build any ports with base/* as I'm still trying to
just do a buildworld (and running poudriere in a qemu image of mips64 would
be very unpleasant).  I think probably base/binutils just needs to drop the
names with a full tuple if possible.

-- 
John Baldwin