amd64-binutils file name structure for utils vs. for powerpc64-binutils and aarch64-binutils

[Alexander Kabaev]

On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:30:08 -0700
Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain <freebsd-toolchain at freebsd.org>
wrote:

> For:
> 
> # pkg info "*binutils"
> aarch64-binutils-2.30_2,1
> amd64-binutils-2.30_2,1
> binutils-2.30_2,1
> powerpc64-binutils-2.30_2,1
> 
> # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]"
> Relative URL: ^/head
> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports
> Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5
> Revision: 466704
> Last Changed Rev: 466704
> 
> in a amd64 context . . .
> 
> amd64-binutils uses file naming that does not match the
> patterns that aarch64-binutils and powerpc64-binutils
> use. Using an example type of binutil for illustration
> (in a 12.0 head context):
> 
> # find /usr/local/bin /usr/local/*freebsd* -name "*addr2line*" -print
> /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-unknown-freebsd12.0-addr2line
> /usr/local/bin/x86_64-freebsd-addr2line
> /usr/local/bin/addr2line
> /usr/local/bin/aarch64-unknown-freebsd12.0-addr2line
> 
> The differences involve the lack of:
> 
> -unknown
> 12.0
> 
> (Of course, plain binutils does not have such conventions.)
> 
> Is this expected/intended?
> 
> 
> For reference:
> 
> # uname -apKU
> FreeBSD FBSDFSSD 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT  r332181M  amd64
> amd64 1200061 1200061

No, this is not indented, but that is how GCC/binutils configure
works. When building 'native' config, it does not install full
triple-prefixed binaries. I had to manually work around that in
powerpc64-gcc, looks like bintuils need the same treatment. 

-- 
Alexander Kabaev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/attachments/20180407/6b98ae3d/attachment.sig>