Duplicate OPT_ entries in gcc/options.h

[Jung-uk Kim]

On 06/ 8/16 07:09 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 09 Jun 2016, at 00:30, Jung-uk Kim <jkim at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 06/ 8/16 06:16 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> On 08 Jun 2016, at 23:54, Jung-uk Kim <jkim at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/ 8/16 05:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>>>> On 08 Jun 2016, at 21:11, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I got a user report, and could reproduce this, that building
>>>>>> GCC (lang/gcc, but also current HEAD, so probably pretty much
>>>>>> any version) with FreeBSD 11 and LANG = en_US.UTF-8 we get
>>>>>> conflicting entires in $BUILDDIR/gcc/options.h such as
>>> ...
>>>>> Note that GNU awk does *not* produce a different optionlist file when
>>>>> used with either LANG=C or LANG=en_US.UTF-8.
>>> ...
>>>>> So I am assuming that the ARRAY[j-1] > ARRAY[j] comparison works
>>>>> differently in our awk, depending on the LANG settings.  No idea when
>>>>> that changed, though, if it changed at all...
>>>>
>>>> This behaviour is known for very long time:
>>>>
>>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/173731
>>>>
>>>> and it is not our fault:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/html_node/POSIX-String-Comparison.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed, so the real question is: why does this only started coming up
>>> now, if it is known since 2007?  I have been building gcc ports for
>>> ages, and never ran into this problem, but I also have never actively
>>> used a persistent LANG environment variable, let alone with UTF-8 in it.
>>>
>>> Is this because more people started using UTF-8 recently?
>>
>> We are doing more correct collation now:
>>
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/290494
> 
> Indeed.  This problem has come up before on the ports mailing list,
> almost immediately after that commit:
> 
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-November/101034.html
> 
> Apparently some proposals were made to set LANG and LC_ALL to C globally
> for port builds, but it was never implemented?

tijl proposed it but never implemented because of difficulties to
exp-run the change, it seems.

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151127145552.GA19655

> I guess more people are now noticing it, because they are trying out the
> 11.0-ALPHA installers.

Which is good. :-)

Jung-uk Kim

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/attachments/20160608/2f3ad9e4/attachment.sig>