GCC5: pkg vs. ports

[Kubilay Kocak]

Hi William,

You may be seeing a previously saved config, try make rmconfig then check
again, or look at OPTIONS_DEFAULT inside Makefile

You're correct, if graphite *is* a default option, the package should have
it . Only other thing I can think of is a silent graphite build failure
that isn't fatal, resulting in a built but incomplete package. Unlikely all
else being equal though

Let us know what you find

./koobs
On 2 Feb 2016 3:06 AM, "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam at hiwaay.net> wrote:

>
>
> I just did a full 'pkg upgrade' on my FBSD 9.3R box, which installed the
> newest GCC5. I also updated ports. When I used the pkg-provided GCC5, it
> doesn't have graphite support enabled, so no auto-parallelization. When I
> checked the port w/ make showconfig. it shows graphite enabled. I am
> recompiling it as I write this, but I thought the pkg was/is configured
> from the port & would have graphite enabled by default, w/ no recompile
> needed on my part, no ? I have the various other pkg's req'd for graphite
> support pkg-installed (& just updated this A.M.), so I thought I was ready
> to go. Not a huge issue, but recompiling the compiler shoots about an hour
> on my box, would be sweet to avoid that. TIA for any clues & have a good
> one.
>
>
> --
>
>         William A. Mahaffey III
>
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
>          ever devised by man."
>                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-toolchain at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
> freebsd-toolchain-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>