[toolchain] gcc5-devel question
    William A. Mahaffey III 
    wam at hiwaay.net
       
    Wed Dec 23 15:58:52 UTC 2015
    
    
  
On 12/23/15 05:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>> However, pkg did reinstall gcc5-devel-5.2.1.s20151124 due to changed
>> options. I cd'ed to /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel & poked around a bit. I
>> saw no files or directories dated today, the latest was dated Dec 02,
>> the last time I upgraded & did a 'make install'. I did a find in
>> /usr/ports & /usr/ports/lang/gcc5-devel was all there was. Did the
>> compiler indeed get reinstalled ? If so, where :-) ?
> the location should not have changed, nor should have any packaging
> (additional files, say).
1st, thanks for your reply. This question was/is stupidly worded :-). 
What I was/am asking is whether the pkg-installed version of this 
compiler is compiled for Graphite support OOTB. The answer appears to be 
'no'. I just pkg-upgraded to the newest version & it is now called 5.3.1:
[29/33] Upgrading gcc5-devel from 5.2.1.s20151124 to 5.3.1.s20151208...
[29/33] Extracting gcc5-devel-5.3.1.s20151208: .......... done
However, when queried from the command line, it doesn't mention 'libisl' 
(req'd for Graphite support) & when I try to compile code using Graphite 
optimization (-floop-parallelize-all for me) it fails w/ an error 
message saying Graphite support not available:
f951: sorry, unimplemented: Graphite loop optimizations cannot be used 
(ISL is not available)(-fgraphite, -fgraphite-identity, -floop-block, 
-floop-interchange, -floo
p-strip-mine, -floop-parallelize-all, -floop-unroll-and-jam, and 
-ftree-loop-linear)
libisl is indeed available, pkg installed & ready to go. When I upgraded 
ports (portsnap fetch update) this A.M., nothing got upgraded, 
everything still dated 12/09 or earlier (when I last rebuilt it to turn 
on Graphite support, which apparently worked AOK) except for the log 
files from my compile. The port showed/shows Graphite enabled by default 
(I think). So, another question is whether the pkg & port have different 
build configurations ?
>
>> Also, when I did a 'make showconfig', it showed graphite support ready
>> to go (*yippeeee*, kudos), but no executable that I could locate on
>> short notice. Do I still need to compile it up, or is there an
>> executable ready to go somewhere not-so-obvious to me :-) ?
> Graphite support means additional optimizations GCC can perform (if
> you specify the respective options).
>
> You need to build the lang/gcc* ports that support Graphite with the
> respective option (GRAPHITE) enabled.  It is off by default, and thus
> not part of packages.
>
>> When I last compiled it up last week, I did a 'make install
>> FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1' which overwrote /usr/local/bin/gcc5 (not a huge
>> issue, but still ....), how do I tell it to install the executable under
>> a different name ? BTW, I am *NOT* particularly familiar w/ the 'GNU
>> way', so pardon me if this is a bit noobish :-/ .... TIA & have a good
>> one.
> I am not aware of the FreeBSD packaging system supporting the renaming
> of individual files within a package.  You could try to install into a
> different location and then tweak things there, I guess.
>
> Gerald
>
-- 
	William A. Mahaffey III
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
	"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
	 ever devised by man."
                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.
    
    
More information about the freebsd-toolchain
mailing list