Strawman proposal: making libthr default thread implementation?

David Xu davidxu at freebsd.org
Mon Jul 3 13:25:48 UTC 2006


On Monday 03 July 2006 20:40, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> No, I think those are what libthr lacks in supporting POSIX.
> I think the problem will be getting our 3 kernel schedulers to
> support them.

it is mutex code and priority propagating which is already
supported by turnstile code, in theory, it is not depended
on scheduler.


More information about the freebsd-threads mailing list