GDB 6.0 and FreeBSD threads
    Niall Douglas 
    s_sourceforge at nedprod.com
       
    Mon Mar 29 21:35:10 PST 2004
    
    
  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 29 Mar 2004 at 20:38, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Ah but Linux and Solaris have gone the other way..
> They have abandonned M:N in favour of N:N with kernel based thread
> suspension.
I haven't implemented a thread scheduler in some years, but I am more 
familiar with what's required than many who state an opinion on M:N 
vs. 1:1. My instinct says that M:N is the superior solution - I don't 
have anything to prove this and certainly it'll be tricky, but 
generally anything which increases parallelisability will increase 
scalability.
I had been watching your work from afar just out of interest in how 
you do with a real M:N implementation. Someone asked for my library 
to work on FreeBSD, so now I'm actually part of the process. I look 
forward to it.
Cheers,
Niall
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: idw's PGP-Frontend 4.9.6.1 / 9-2003 + PGP 8.0.2
iQA/AwUBQGkHJsEcvDLFGKbPEQK2dQCePDAlbbO0nW1izrS38nByHSqxZX8An1uz
fdEpkLzqfDuPzS2eMu01vw10
=aVNt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    
More information about the freebsd-threads
mailing list