About the kse signal process

[Daniel Eischen]

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, David Xu wrote:
> From: "xiong jinshan" <xiongjinshan at yahoo.com>
> > 
> > --- Daniel Eischen <eischen at vigrid.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > >   I am wondering that the following piece of code
> > > > can't work with the unix semantics. I tested it
> > > with
> > > > 5.1 release and i386 arch. By unix sementics, if I
> > > > send the SIGALRM to this running programme, it
> > > should
> > > > be received by the thr_func() only, and print a
> > > prompt
> > > > msg on the console.
> > > 
> > > Yes, only thr_func() should receive the alarm.
> > This is the issue. Nothing printed on the console when
> > I sent the signal SIGALRM, it meant that none of the
> > thread received this signal.
[ ... ]
> 
> Missing alarm() call ?

I noticed that too, but I assumed he knew that.  I sent
the alarm with kill(1) from another shell.

-- 
Dan Eischen