About the kse signal process

[Daniel Eischen]

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> --- Daniel Eischen <eischen at vigrid.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >   I am wondering that the following piece of code
> > > can't work with the unix semantics. I tested it
> > with
> > > 5.1 release and i386 arch. By unix sementics, if I
> > > send the SIGALRM to this running programme, it
> > should
> > > be received by the thr_func() only, and print a
> > prompt
> > > msg on the console.
> > 
> > Yes, only thr_func() should receive the alarm.
> This is the issue. Nothing printed on the console when
> I sent the signal SIGALRM, it meant that none of the
> thread received this signal.

It works for me with both libc_r and libkse.  This is from
a very recent -current.  I can't test under 5.1-release.
There have been some changes lately with regard to signals
in -current and libkse.  I don't know about libc_r...

--
Dan Eischen