KSE signals broken by 1:1 commit.

Julian Elischer julian at elischer.org
Mon Apr 7 01:01:50 PDT 2003



On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304062300100.55025-100000 at InterJet.elischer.org>
>             Julian Elischer <julian at elischer.org> writes:
> : We are in a bind..
> : Jeff has committed changes that have broken the KSE view of signals.
> : however he is out of the picture for a week now.
> : This means that we can not pass our changes past him as we try fix it.
> : This is made more difficult because it appears that 1:1 threads is
> : broken at the moment, (see mail comments in -current),
> 
> Patches have been posted.  Have you tried them yet?
> 
> : so we can not test our changes against the 1:1 threads code.
> 
> This is related to the LAZY stuff that was committed.
> 
> : All I want is a comment that assuming we take care, if jeff gets back 
> : and finds that we've broken something for him, that we are not 
> : nailed to a tree for it.
> 
> Jeff's mail said he'd be gone only 3 more days.  Things for most
> people aren't broken, so there's no need to rush, imho.  I also think
> Jeff has limited access to the net, so he should be able to review
> things.  I don't think that there's an urgent need for core to
> override the normal workings of the project at this time.  See if you
> can catch him with this limited access.  I'm uneasy about granting an
> exception to the rules when I haven't even seen a proposed patch.
> 
> That's just my personal opinion.

Actually i thought he was away for longer and I thought he had no
access. if he has access we'll try run things past him first..


 > 
> Warner
> 



More information about the freebsd-threads mailing list