FreeBSD CI Weekly Report 2019-03-24

Ed Maste emaste at freebsd.org
Thu Mar 28 14:19:49 UTC 2019


On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 06:26, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> * 2286 builds (98.3% passed, 1.7% failed) were executed on aarch64,
> amd64, armv6, armv7, i386, mips, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64,
> powerpcspe, riscv64, sparc64 architectures for head, stable/12,
> stable/11 branches.

This is pretty good news - HEAD is almost always in a buildable state.

> * 498 test runs (37.3% passed, 60.7% unstable, 2% exception) were
> executed on amd64, i386, riscv64 architectures for head, stable/12,
> stable/11 branches.

This is not so good, almost two thirds of test runs don't pass. Does
it make sense to submit PRs for the current known issues and then
either XFAIL or disable those tests, so that CI will highlight newly
introduced failures?


More information about the freebsd-testing mailing list