[Bug 201286] tools/regression/security/open_to_operation/open_to_operation.c:172: bad if test ?
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Mon Nov 9 07:26:52 UTC 2015
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201286
--- Comment #3 from commit-hook at freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: ngie
Date: Mon Nov 9 07:26:34 UTC 2015
New revision: 290580
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/290580
Log:
MFC r290190,r290251:
r290190:
Fix compiler warnings with open_to_operation.c
Other sidenotes:
- Remove unused variables with main(..)
- Convert errx/exit with -1 to errx/exit with 1
- Fix a bogus test in try_directory_open
(expected_errno == expected_errno -> errno == expected_errno) [*]
- Fix some warnings related to discarded qualifiers
- Remove a bogus else-statement at the end of check_mmap_exec(..) in the
successful case. mmap(2), POSIX, Linux, etc all don't state what the
behavior is when mixing O_WRONLY + PROT_EXEC, so assume success for now to
get the test program to pass again.
PR: 201286 [*]
Submitted by: David Binderman <dcb314 at hotmail.com>
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
r290251:
Use nitems(x) instead of sizeof(x)/sizeof(x[0])
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
Changes:
_U stable/10/
stable/10/tools/regression/security/open_to_operation/Makefile
stable/10/tools/regression/security/open_to_operation/open_to_operation.c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-testing
mailing list