Should we MFC tests into stable/10?
jmmv at freebsd.org
Thu Mar 6 14:32:32 UTC 2014
Keeping the testing infrastructure in sync between current and
stable/10 is, in my opinion, a worthy goal. For that reason, I have
(finally) pulled up a bunch of related pending changes into the branch
today and will continue to do so for upcoming improvements.
However, I would like to gather your opinion on what to do about the
Do you think it's worth keeping the tests between current and
stable/10 in sync wherever possible? Because we have barely just
started adding tests, this will certainly involve quite a bit of churn
in MFCs -- but that's probably not a big deal. The tricky^Winteresting
cases will come when tests start failing in only one of the two
My opinion is now leaning towards merging everything where it makes
sense. What's yours?
More information about the freebsd-testing