standards/86484: [PATCH] mkfifo(1) uses wrong permissions
das at FreeBSD.ORG
Sun Jan 27 20:17:02 PST 2008
POSIX's description of how umask interacts with -m for various
tools is a maze of twisting little references, all different;
it wouldn't surprise me if they meant something other than what
they said. :)
To take a step back, I would argue that mkfifo(1), mkdir(1), and
install(1) should all have similar semantics with respect to -m,
to reduce confusion. What those semantics are, I'm not sure.
Solaris 10 seems to behave as FreeBSD does, and Linux 2.6.12 seems
to behave as Toby Petersin wants FreeBSD to behave.
More information about the freebsd-standards