Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

Hajimu UMEMOTO ume at FreeBSD.org
Tue Sep 21 10:09:29 PDT 2004


Hi,

>>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
>>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks at one-eyed-alien.net> said:

brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
brooks> work with.  A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
brooks> best approach.

I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/


More information about the freebsd-standards mailing list