standards/61934: [PATCH] FreeBSD's mailx not completely
SUSv3-compliant
Wartan Hachaturow
wart at tepkom.ru
Sun Feb 8 22:50:23 PST 2004
The following reply was made to PR standards/61934; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wartan Hachaturow <wart at tepkom.ru>
To: Mike Heffner <mheffner at vt.edu>
Cc: Wartan Hachaturow <wart at tepkom.ru>,
FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: standards/61934: [PATCH] FreeBSD's mailx not completely SUSv3-compliant
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:37:35 +0300
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:59:59AM -0500, Mike Heffner wrote:
> I've done a quick first pass, comments are inlined.
Okay, thanks for looking at this :) I'll fix the issues you're
pointed at, and submit a new version of the patch.
> checkmail and use it instead for the -e option? Also, the fprintf that
> displays "No mail for ..." should not be printed when using the -e option.
> SuSv3 states that when using the -e option, nothing should be printed.
Well, I've interpreted the phrase "The mailx utility shall write nothing
and exit with a successful return code if there is mail to read" like
that "one should not print anything in "there is mail" case".
Of course, since most prospective use of -e is in scripts, printing
in "no mail" case is, perhaps, futile :)
--
Regards, Wartan.
"Be different: conform."
More information about the freebsd-standards
mailing list