comments on proposed uthread_write.c changes
kern at sibbald.com
Wed Sep 10 08:40:34 PDT 2003
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 16:53, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On 10 Sep 2003 09:19:43 +0200, Kern Sibbald <kern at sibbald.com> said:
> > Can you explain how you came to the conclusion that a non-zero
> > write may not return zero? Keep in mind that from the
> > user's or my standpoint, we are talking about blocking
> > writes.
> That is not my conclusion. My conclusion is that, if write() returns
> zero, it must be a permanent condition; that is to say, when write()
> returns zero it is not appropriate to retry, as one would do for a
> partial write of non-zero length.
Yes, sorry, I misunderstood -- my mistake.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards/attachments/20030910/a04e3046/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-standards