standards/41576: POSIX compliance of ln(1)
Wartan Hachaturow
wart at tepkom.ru
Fri Jul 4 13:40:20 PDT 2003
The following reply was made to PR standards/41576; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wartan Hachaturow <wart at tepkom.ru>
To: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl at univie.ac.at>
Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org, tjr at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: standards/41576: POSIX compliance of ln(1)
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 00:30:46 +0400
> cd /tmp
> mkdir foo bar
> ln -s foo bla ### now /tmp/bla symlinks to /tmp/foo
> ln -sf bar bla ### replace /tmp/bla to point to /tmp/bar, doesn't work
FreeBSD is perfectly SUSv3 (IEEE Std 1003.1, 2003)-compliant here.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/utilities/ln.html says
that ln should use unlink() on destination in case of "-f" option
used. And conformant implementation of unlink's ".. path argument shall
not name a directory unless the process has appropriate privileges and
the implementation supports using unlink() on directories".
Moreover, later, in informational section we see:
"APPLICATION USAGE
Applications should use rmdir() to remove a directory."
FreeBSD's ln uses unlink() and behaves correctly on regular files, and it
should not work that way with directories.
Bug may be closed, I guess, and ln(1) may be changed back.
One thing that we may do is to make ln print a warning in case of -f on
a directory, but I personally think it's not worth it.
--
Regards, Wartan.
"Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are."
More information about the freebsd-standards
mailing list