ZFS ARC vs Inactive memory on 10-STABLE: is it Ok?

Lev Serebryakov lev at FreeBSD.org
Mon Feb 15 14:29:13 UTC 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


 I have mostly-storage server with 8GB of physical RAM and 9TB (5x2TB
HDD) raidz ZFS pool (so, about 6.5TB usable space).

 ARC is limited to 3GB by vfs.zfs.arc_max.

 This server runs Samba (of course), CrashPlan backup client (Linux
Java!), and torrent client (transmission-daemon).

 And I'm noticing this regularly ("screenshot" of top(1)):

Mem: 1712M Active, 3965M Inact, 2066M Wired, 137M Cache, 822M Buf,
4688K Free
ARC: 421M Total, 132M MFU, 54M MRU, 1040K Anon, 7900K Header, 227M Other
Swap: 4096M Total, 248M Used, 3848M Free, 6% Inuse

 As you can see, here are almost 4G of Inactive memory and only 412M
of ARC!

 Is it Ok? Why Inactive memory (non-dirty buffers?) are pressed ARC
out of memory?

- -- 
// Lev Serebryakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=In6V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list