recommended poudriere jail versions?

[Guido Falsi]

On 10/01/15 14:05, Mark Martinec wrote:
> 2015-10-01 10:32, Marko Cupać wrote:
>> what is the recommended poudriere jail version for building ports? So
>> far I was trying to be on latest binary patchlevel for every minor
>> version for both base system, poudriere jails and clients, but I ended
>> up with three jails just for amd64 (9.3, 10.1 and 10.2), where I need to
>> rebuild all the ports every time I patch poudriere jails. This is
>> starting to take too much of my time.
>>
>> I see that pkg.freebsd.org hosts just one set of ports per
>> architecture of major version. What is the OS version they are built
>> on? Are there any downsides in building all the ports for
>> 10.2-<latestpathclevel> on 10.1-<nopatches>?
> 
> I used to have poudriere jails based on a minor version like you have,
> but ended up in a simplified setup, building ports only on 10.0-RELEASE
> and installing them on 10.1 or 10.2 and 10-STABLE. I think the
> official packages are also built based on 10.0-RELEASE .

Official packages are being build on 10.1-RELEASE at present. It's the
lowest supported minor in the 10 branch.

-- 
Guido Falsi <mad at madpilot.net>