What is your favourite/best firewall on FreeBSD and why?

[Dr Josef Karthauser]

On 23 May 2014, at 10:00, G. Paul Ziemba <pz-freebsd-stable at ziemba.us> wrote:

> Lucius.Rizzo at The.ie (Lucius Rizzo) writes:
> 
>> Ultimately, outside configuration differences all firewalls are essentially
>> serve the same purpose but I wonder what is your favorite and why? If
>> you were to run FreeBSD in production, which of the three would you
>> choose? IPFilter, PF or IPFW?
> 
> I switched to pf about seven months ago as I began to need to
> manage bandwidth for specific classes of traffic (for example,
> prevent outbound mailing list email from saturating the link
> and reserve some bandwidth for interactive use).
> 
> The syntax is very close and the NAT configuration is simpler in pf.

Does the pfsync handle NAT tables.
Could I use it to build a resilient carrier grade NAT solution?

Joe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20140523/614f3521/attachment.sig>