LDAP authentication confusion

Daniel Eischen deischen at freebsd.org
Mon Jul 15 19:09:48 UTC 2013


On Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Michael Loftis wrote:

> nss_ldap fulfills most of the get*ent calls, thus based on the bits of
> your configuration you've exposed I think you're ending up with that
> behavior and not using pam_ldap at all.  Instead the authentication is
> happening via nsswitch fulfilling getpwent() call's (the passwd: files
> ldap line in nsswitch.conf)

Ok, thanks.  But shouldn't the documentation be changed
to reflect that?

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Daniel Eischen <deischen at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> There's an article on LDAP authentication on FreeBSD here:
>>
>>   http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/ldap-auth/article.html#client
>>
>> I'm confused as to why pam_ldap and nss_ldap do not need
>> /etc/pam.d entries, as described in the above link in
>> section 3.1.1.  Meaning, I do not have any ldap entries
>> in my /etc/pam.d/ or even /usr/local/etc/pam.d/ and
>> ldap logins work (console, ssh, telnet, ftp).
>>
>>   $ grep -i ldap /etc/pam.d/*
>>   $ grep -i ldap /usr/local/etc/pam.d/*
>>
>> What am I missing?
>>
>>   $ uname -v
>>   FreeBSD slrtr1 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r250347...
>>   $ uname -m
>>   amd64
>>   $ cat /etc/nsswitch.conf
>>   group: files ldap
>>   hosts: files dns
>>   networks: files
>>   passwd: files ldap
>>   shells: files
>>   services: files
>>   protocols: files
>>   rpc: files

-- 
DE


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list