svn - but smaller?

[Frank Staals]

Oliver Brandmueller <ob at e-Gitt.NET> writes:

> <snip> 
>
> So, is there some alternative small svn client, that leaves a 
> drastically smaller footprint probably somewhere around, probably even 
> in the ports or is there anything I'm missing? 
> <snip> 

This type of question has been asked quite a few times recently. At this
point there is no svn version of csup, however there were people working
on it (or at least: there is a svnsup project). For details please
search recent ports or questions mailing list archives. As far as I know
there is also no alternative svn-client. 

I'm kind of surprised for the need of this though. Why not simply use
portsnap if you are not actively developing ports? 

-- 

- Frank