sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

[Hajimu UMEMOTO]

Hi,

>>>>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:28:28 +0100
>>>>> Ulrich Spörlein <uqs at FreeBSD.org> said:

uqs> The source address problem I'm now talking about is happening on my
uqs> router at home, which has a Sixxs tunnel and needs to use AICCU of all
uqs> things to talk to the outside world, sixxs-aiccu will create the tun(4)
uqs> interface and set it up like this:

uqs> tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1280
uqs>         options=80000<LINKSTATE>
uqs>         inet6 fe80::230:5ff:fe77:e7a0%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd 
uqs>         inet6 fe80::2428:ff00:1b:2%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd 
uqs>         inet6 2a02:2528:ff00:1b::2 --> 2a02:2528:ff00:1b::1 prefixlen 128 
uqs>         nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL>
uqs>         Opened by PID 82756

uqs> and I'd like to have ipv6 connection originating from this host use
uqs> 2a02:2528:ff0d::1%em0 instead of 2a02:2528:ff00:1b::2%tun0 as the
uqs> outgoing address. That tun0 interface can come and go, btw, which
uqs> complicates things. Is this possible? Or should I just switch to the one
uqs> local DSL provide I have here that actually offers native IPv6 for home
uqs> DSL users?

It is impossible with RFC 6724 / 3484 as hrs@ said.  So, I made
modification.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO
ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/