sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1

[Hajimu UMEMOTO]

Hi,

>>>>> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 23:42:10 +0900 (JST)
>>>>> Hiroki Sato <hrs at FreeBSD.org> said:

hrs>  This is because the prefix on the interface has the first priority.
hrs>  Why don't you use an fe80::/10 address to route packets to the other
hrs>  endpoint of tun0?

I don't like this policy.  I think it reduce the availability of the
policy table.  So, I'm disabling it locally by applying the attached
patch.

Sincerely,

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: no_prefer_iface.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2719 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20130109/546e6461/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ifconfig-no_prefer_iface.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1970 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20130109/546e6461/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO
ume at mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.mahoroba.org/~ume/