sendmail vs ipv6 broken after upgrade to 9.1
Ulrich Spörlein
uqs at freebsd.org
Tue Jan 8 18:40:58 UTC 2013
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 18:36:34 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 16:18, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I upgraded a server running 8.x to 9.1 over the weekend and sendmail no
> > longer wants to bind the AF_INET6 sockets.
> >
> > So while this still works:
> >
> > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MSA, M=Eu, InputMailFilters=dkim')
> > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp, Addr=::1, Name=MSA, Family=inet6, M=Eu, InputMailFilters=dkim')
> >
> > this is broken:
> >
> > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=submission, Addr=acme.spoerlein.net, Name=MSA, M=E, InputMailFilters=dkim')
> > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=submission, Addr=acme.spoerlein.net, Name=MSA, Family=inet6, M=E, InputMailFilters=dkim')
> >
> > which makes me believe this has to do with name resolution...
> >
> > The actual reported errors are:
> >
> > Jan 8 16:05:03 acme sm-msp-queue[98057]: starting daemon (8.14.6): queueing at 00:30:00
> > Jan 8 16:05:03 acme sm-mta[98054]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): opendaemonsocket: daemon MSA: cannot bind: Can't assign requested address
>
> What's the output of the 'ip6addrctl' command on your machine?
>
> Cheers
> Michiel
root at acme: ~# ip6addrctl
Prefix Prec Label Use
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 50 0 0
::1/128 40 1 0
::/0 30 2 72866
2002::/16 20 3 4
::/96 10 4 0
Gah! I remember having to set ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer" on another
system that I upgraded to 9.x a long time ago.
After setting this, it now looks like this:
root at acme: ~# ip6addrctl
Prefix Prec Label Use
::1/128 50 0 0
::/0 40 1 0
2002::/16 30 2 0
::/96 20 3 0
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 10 4 0
And even sendmail is happily finding the sockets to bind to. Thanks for the hint!
The bigger question now is, why don't we want to have a working IPv6 out of the
box?
Regards,
Uli
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list