BIND segway -> python -> first-class ports

Daniel O'Connor doconnor at gsoft.com.au
Wed Dec 4 02:23:30 UTC 2013


On 4 Dec 2013, at 12:41, Alfred Perlstein <alfred at freebsd.org> wrote:
> So yes, let's get python in base, but *not make it user visible*. We need to only make it visible for internal use of our "src base".

This would still be problematic for, say hypothetical Python bindings to BIND (I have no idea if they exist but let's assume they do).

Either the bindings are hidden, in which case only 'base' can use them which makes them pointless, or they would need to be an external port (but they which Python would they use? ergh..)

This is like the problem with Open Office having its own Python - unless you run that binary you can't safely use the bindings which renders them almost useless.

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C








More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list