Suggest changing dirhash defaults for FreeBSD 9.2.
Robert_Burmeister
robert.burmeister at utoledo.edu
Wed Aug 28 20:35:54 UTC 2013
>>>> I believe that increasing the following values by 10 would benefit
>>>> most FreeBSD users without disadvantage.
>>>>
>>>> vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152 to 20971520
>>>>
>>>> vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage: 5 to 50 or 60
>>> vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is further autotuned based on available
>>> physical memory.
>>> See r214359 for details.
>>>
>
> To what value does the algorithm tune in your case? On my 16 GB machine,
> it's ~~ 25 MB:
>
> vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 26968064
>
> The policy is to use fractions of the installed RAM (though in a
> roundabout way), so it should scale reasonably well to both systems with
> large and small memories.
>
> I'll bump vfs.ufs.dirhash_reclaimage to 60, it's worth it.
I'm running 2 Gigs of RAM, so it sets to 2 Megs.
As compiling most of the system uses ~1.5 Gigs, I can certainly use the
cache.
Note that allocated kernel memory does not scale linearly with physical RAM,
so a policy to use fractions of kernel memory may be more appropriate.
~25 Megs is a good value, however, as the reclaim value is a portion of
vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem, a much larger cache and it becomes pyric
as it can keep wiping out a small active cache.
(I tested vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem up to 60 megs.)
--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Suggest-changing-dirhash-defaults-for-FreeBSD-9-2-tp5839351p5839755.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list