svn - but smaller?
smithi at nimnet.asn.au
Thu Apr 11 13:04:07 UTC 2013
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013, mrboco at gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:57:12 AM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
> > Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and works
> > basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative. Although it
> > appears to be quite resource greedy. Most of the time it showed
> > something like:
> > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
> > 22270 mkushnir 1 102 0 44944K 31804K CPU0 1 6:22 97.56% a.out
> It's because of typo in the send_command() procedure.
> I've placed the patched svnup.c (0.56), the diff and two statically
> linked binaries on http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/boco/freebsd/svnup/
> No more CPU eating and/or strange lockups (so far). Tested both
> against local and remote repository.
I'm sorry, but even ignoring all of your whitespace and style(9)
differences, your patch appears to go well beyond correcting a typo,
which I can't spot anyway, though I'm sure John will know what it is.
Care to explain a little more?
Also, what advantage, in this particular case, is there in statically
linking? Here it turns a 21.5K i386 binary into one of 575K. If this
makes it into base, as I hope it may, that seems a little excessive?
More information about the freebsd-stable