svn - but smaller?

[mrboco at gmail.com]

On Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:57:12 AM UTC+6, Markiyan Kushnir wrote:
> Tested svnup for a while, and I can say it does its job well, and works 
> basically as I would expect, so thanks for your initiative. Although it 
> appears to be quite resource greedy. Most of the time it showed 
> something like:
> 
>   PID USERNAME    THR PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
> 22270 mkushnir      1 102    0 44944K 31804K CPU0    1   6:22 97.56% a.out

It's because of typo in the send_command() procedure.

I've placed the patched svnup.c (0.56), the diff and two statically linked binaries on http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/boco/freebsd/svnup/

No more CPU eating and/or strange lockups (so far). Tested both against local and remote repository.