Increasing the DMESG buffer....

Adrian Chadd adrian at freebsd.org
Thu Nov 22 07:12:18 UTC 2012


On 21 November 2012 20:16, Ian Smith <smithi at nimnet.asn.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:08:42 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>  > .. because some of us like kernel behaviour to be predictable and
>  > controllable, rather than 'just be dynamic here, what could possibly
>  > go wrong.'
>  >
>  > Just bump the default kernel buffer size up to 64k and leave it
>  > hard-coded like that. Us embedded people can drop that down to
>  > something smaller.
>  >
>  > There. Problem solved, right?
>
> Well maybe, but I still tend to take Andriy's point about snd_hda.  For
> example, Lars Engels posted several verbose dmesgs the other day, not to
> do with sound, one of which was:
>  http://bsd-geek.de/FreeBSD/T61_dmesg.boot.10.works
>
> T61_dmesg.boot.10.works (file 1 of 2) lines 1813-1861/1861 byte 82415/82415
>
> Cutting just the hdaa0, pcm0 and pcm1 stuff results in:
>
> hda_pcm.verbose (file 2 of 2) lines 712-760/760 byte 28531/28531

Is there a way to extract this topology information out of the driver
without putting it in the verbose output?



Adrian


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list