buildworld fails on recent stable

Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kworr at
Mon Nov 5 16:28:58 UTC 2012

05.11.2012 18:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I bet on clang 3.2.
> Thank you for checking.
> So how do we proceed from here?
> I could just revert the MFC-es, but the functionality could be desirable to some
> users.  Are there any alternatives?

Dunno, clang 3.2 is still pending so I guess it wouldn't be MFC'ed until 
December 16th? Being a minor issue it can make some people shrug from 
using clang for testing stable...

I think reverting the working change is not good as far as building 
world with clang is still not the true and default way.

Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.

More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list