buildworld fails on recent stable

[Volodymyr Kostyrko]

05.11.2012 18:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> I bet on clang 3.2.
>
> Thank you for checking.
>
> So how do we proceed from here?
> I could just revert the MFC-es, but the functionality could be desirable to some
> users.  Are there any alternatives?

Dunno, clang 3.2 is still pending so I guess it wouldn't be MFC'ed until 
December 16th? Being a minor issue it can make some people shrug from 
using clang for testing stable...

I think reverting the working change is not good as far as building 
world with clang is still not the true and default way.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.