[patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

[Mark Felder]

On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 20:00:27 +0100
Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen at ose.nl> wrote:

> Though the last 10 years I have not had the inconvenience of having to 
> deal with long fsck' s or bgfsck' s on servers or workstation installs, 
> so I think this should not be default on new installs.

This is one man's opinion. On the other hand, SUJ by default is a godsend for me because of the number of crashes/fscks I've been dealing with.